(She met him in Seattle. "[55] From Ephesus he wrote the three epistles attributed to him. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS Church) teaches that, "John is mentioned frequently in latter-day revelation (1 Ne. Vol.
Generally listed as the youngest apostle, he was the son of Zebedee and Salome. ), The men, four of whom are ill, were indicted for fraud. However, some Muslim scholars mentioned their names,[72] probably relying on the resources of Christians, who are considered "People of the Book". The feast day of Saint John in the Roman Catholic Church, which calls him "Saint John, Apostle and Evangelist", and in the Anglican Communion and Lutheran Calendars, which call him "Saint John the Apostle and Evangelist", is on 27 December.
It's whoever in both cases. Historians have related such portrayals to the circumstances of the believers for whom they were intended. a 2 Judas his betrayer also knew the place, because Jesus had often met there with his disciples. This technique of substituting a personal pronoun for the relative pronoun works nicely whenever you have difficulty deciding whether to use who or whom, assuming that you have no difficulty using the proper form of personal pronouns. The persecution of Christians under Herod Agrippa I led to the scattering of the Apostles through the Roman Empire's provinces.[cf. [54] According to tradition, after the Assumption of Mary, John went to Ephesus. Introduction. James D. G. Dunn and John William Rogerson, Brown, Raymond E. 1970. (Not whom. How would Earth turn into debris drifting through space without everything at its surface being destroyed?
[Lk 22:8][16] At the meal itself, the "disciple whom Jesus loved" sat next to Jesus. The Church Fathers identify him as John the Evangelist, John of Patmos, John the Elder and the Beloved Disciple, and testify that he outlived the remaining apostles and that he was the only one to die of natural causes. [85] After the Middle Ages, feminizing portrayals of Saint John continued to be made; a case in point is an etching by Jacques Bellange, shown to the right, described by art critic Richard Dorment as depicting "a softly androgynous creature with a corona of frizzy hair, small breasts like a teenage girl, and the round belly of a mature woman. [69] John, along with the Three Nephites, will live to see the Second Coming of Christ as translated beings. And that word is always in the nominative case, so it's “who.” For example: In this sentence, I decided to vote for whoever called me first: [29], Nonetheless, today many theological scholars continue to accept the traditional authorship. [11] John the Apostle is traditionally believed to be one of two disciples (the other being Andrew) recounted in John 1: 35-39, who upon hearing the Baptist point out Jesus as the "Lamb of God", followed Jesus and spent the day with him. [14] Tradition identifies this disciple as Saint John. [Jn 19:25-27] After Jesus' Ascension and the descent of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost, John, together with Peter, took a prominent part in the founding and guidance of the church. [45] However, most biblical scholars now contend that these were separate individuals since the text was written around 100 AD, after the death of John the Apostle,[24][46][47] although many historians have defended the identification of the Author of the Gospel of John with that of the Book of Revelation based on the similarity of the two texts. This tradition is credible because banishment was a common punishment used during the Imperial period for a number of offenses. Colin G. Kruse states that since John the Evangelist has been named consistently in the writings of early Church Fathers, “it is hard to pass by this conclusion, despite widespread reluctance to accept it by many, but by no means all, modern scholars.”[30], The Gospel of John may have been written by an anonymous author. The original community was under the leadership of Apollos (1 Corinthians 1:12). Reading John, Francis J. Moloney, SDB, Dove Press, 1995, Donald Senior, Paul J. Achtemeier, Robert J. Karris (2002:328), "Revelation, Book of." A messianic community existed at Ephesus before Paul's first labors there (cf. English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts.
If you apply those two rules and you're still not sure, apply the all-important Rule #3. [80] One famous example is Leonardo Da Vinci's The Last Supper, whose androgynous portrayal of John/The Beloved Disciple is brought to notice in Dan Brown's novel The Da Vinci Code (2003), where one of the book's characters suggests that the feminine-looking person to Jesus' right is actually Mary Magdalene. The traditions of most Christian denominations have held that John the Apostle is the author of several books of the New Testament. [57], An alternative account of John's death, ascribed by later Christian writers to the early second-century bishop Papias of Hierapolis, claims that he was slain by the Jews. What's the red, white and blue (with stars) banner that Trump was using on the stage in his election campaign? Varying fragments survived in Greek and Latin within monastic libraries. The Catholic Encyclopedia. Because even grammarians are likely to squabble over which to use. (object). The revelation of John could only be what is now called the Book of Revelation. Or better yet, ask them which ancient source they are referring to that says so. We know from context that this title isn’t referring to Peter (“the one whom Jesus loved” interacts with Peter), and scholars believe James died too early to have written this gospel (he’s executed in Acts 12:2). Ask whoever reads that book to answer the question. [60][61] Zahn argues that this reference is actually to John the Baptist. Saint Joseph Edition of the New American Bible: Translated from the Original Languages with Critical Use of All the Ancient Sources: including the Revised New Testament and the Revised Psalms. Print. [19], Church tradition has held that John is the author of the Gospel of John and four other books of the New Testament – the three Epistles of John and the Book of Revelation. How to reject a postdoc offer a few days after accepting it? James and John are listed among the Twelve Apostles. [71] Sunnah did not mention their names either. Some Catholic scholars state that "vocabulary, grammar, and style make it doubtful that the book could have been put into its present form by the same person(s) responsible for the fourth gospel. Why is it wrong to answer a question with a tautology? ), Joyce is the girl who got the job. He was with Peter at the healing of the lame man at Solomon's Porch in the Temple[Ac 3:1 et seq.] The reality is [that] we simply do not have reliable information about what happened to Jesus’ disciples after he died. Here the entire clause is the object of the preposition. How seriously did romantic composers take key characterizations? [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39], Regarding whether the author of the Gospel of John was an eyewitness, according to Paul N. Anderson, the gospel “contains more direct claims to eyewitness origins than any of the other Gospel traditions.”[40] F. F. Bruce argues that 19:35 contains an “emphatic and explicit claim to eyewitness authority.”[41] Bart D. Ehrman, however, does not think the gospel claims to have been written by direct witnesses to the reported events.
[51] These scholars assert that John of Patmos wrote Revelation but neither the Gospel of John nor the Epistles of John. Prophet's Sirah by Ibn Hisham, Chapter: Sending messengers of Allah's Messenger to kings, p.870, Musnad el Imam Ahmad Volume 4, Publisher: Dar al Fikr, p.72, Hadith#17225, Jadranka Prolović, "Socrates and St. John the Apostle: the interchangеable similarity of their portraits", The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, List of biblical figures identified in extra-biblical sources, Saint John the Apostle, patron saint archive, "John 19 Commentary - William Barclay's Daily Study Bible", "John, The Apostle - International Standard Bible Encyclopedia", "Fonck, Leopold. [15], Jesus sent only John and Peter into the city to make the preparation for the final Passover meal (the Last Supper). New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1910. [82] Likewise, Sarah McNamer argues that because of his status as an androgynous saint, John could function as an "image of a third or mixed gender"[83] and "a crucial figure with whom to identify"[84] for male believers who sought to cultivate an attitude of affective piety, a highly emotional style of devotion that, in late-medieval culture, was thought to be poorly compatible with masculinity. ), The delegates differed as to who they thought might win.